Thomas Jollans <t...@tjol.eu> writes: > On 16/10/17 20:02, Pete Forman wrote: >> Thomas Jollans <t...@tjol.eu> writes: >> >>> On 2017-10-16 08:48, Pete Forman wrote: >>>> Andrew Z <form...@gmail.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> hmm. i did do that. maybe just a delay. >>>>> I'll see how it will go tomorrow then. Thank you gents. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Andrew Z <form...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Michael, that's what i use too - gmail. But i get the digest only >>>>>>> and can't really reply that way. i was hoping to get the >>>>>>> mail.python.org list.... >>>>>> >>>>>> Turn off digests then. Easy! >>>> >>>> If you do stick with a digest then check your newsreader for a feature >>>> to expand it. Then you can read and reply as if you were getting >>>> individual posts. >>>> >>> That exists? How does it work? >> >> The Gnus newsreader in Emacs allows you to type C-d on a digest to run >> gnus-summary-enter-digest-group. That then behaves the same as if you >> opened any other summary such as a regular Usenet group. >> > > Does it set the References header correctly when replying?
Sorry, I am not in a position to test. The only digest I subscribe to is comp.risks. The only messsage id in that is a single one for the whole digest. Each article only has date, subject and from headers. You would need to look inside a Python digest to see if it carries more headers for the articles. If they are not present then they cannot be used when composing a reply. -- Pete Forman https://payg.pythonanywhere.com -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
