On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Alberto Berti <albe...@metapensiero.it> > wrote: >> I would really like to find a way to do this that doesn't involve >> decorating the methods in A subclasses to free the final developer to >> remember to import the decorator and apply it, just like I don't want >> him (probably me six months from now) to have to remember to add an >> `else: super()...` to its computation... >> >> Has anyone done this before and has any suggestion about a better way to >> do it? Am I getting it wrong? > > > If you don't want an explicit super() call and you don't want the > decorator to be explicit either then most likely what you need is a > metaclass that will automatically wrap specific methods with your > decorator. Metaclasses are inherited, so all you have to do is set it > for A and it will automatically apply itselt to B and C as well.
Assuming Python 3.6+ (I see you're already using __set_name__) you could probably use __init_subclass__ for this as well. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
