Stefan Ram wrote:
Bill <bill_nos...@whoknows.net> writes:
"Essential Reference", and I would say that Python is definitely a
bigger, and more complicated language than C++.  In some aspects it has
simpler syntax.  But consider all of the ways that you can pass
arguments to a function, for instance. There are definitely alot more
options than in C/C++. I like the way that both of these languages
   In C++, you can pass:

I used the word *arguments*, not parameters. FWIW, *const* seems to correspond to immutable, pretty well. I find Python to be more more like Java, with regard to "passing objects by reference".



     - by value (with a const or non-const parameter)
       (where the value can be a pointer or a non-pointer
       or a pointer-to-member or a unique_ptr or a shared_ptr)
     - by reference
     - by const reference
     - by rvalue reference
     - by universal reference
     - by name (in macros)
     - you can overload functions with the same name
       but different numbers of parameter or different
       types for their parameters
     - you can write templates for functions with ranges of types
       for a parameter
     - default values can be declared for parameters

   In Python, you pass

     - by value

   The section 6.3.4 on calls "in The Python Language
   Reference, Release 3.6.0" encompasses 1½ pages.

You are sounding like a "know-it-all" again.  I am familiar with such
examples.  One could code in C++ for a long time without a definitive
need for templates.
   Ok, so if we exclude from C++ everything that you have not
   learned yet, than, what is left over, is "much easier" for
   you to read "at a glance". It seems that you want C++ to be
   adjusted to your knowledge of it and your assertions about
   it. I think that one should instead adjust one's assertions
   to the reality.

The Python Language Reference, Release 3.6.0         146 pages
latest ISO-C++ draft (without the library part)      464 pages

Bear in mind that you don't have to know every feature of a language to make good use of it, unless, perhaps, that is your job. I don't believe reading the latest "ISO-C++ draft" would be a good use of my time; it sounds like a document geared more to compiler designers. I don't even try to memorize <cmath>. If I need a function, I search for it.

There is a reason that C++, Java and Python all coexist. It might be helpful for you to try to appreciate that.

Regards,
Bill

--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to