Hi, Grant,
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Grant Edwards
<grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2017-08-05, Michael Torrie <torr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Well tk is already an optional part of the Python standard library,
>> whereas wx is an external package. So for your simple requirements,
>> Tk may be the way to go.
>
> I find it much easier to get a simple application written and working
> with Tk than with wx. However, once the size/complexity increases
> beyond a certain point, I find wx to be less work.
What version of wx/python did you try?
It is very easy to work with wx{Python, Phoenix} no matter which application
{complexity} we are talking about.
There are a lot of samples/demos on the wxpython web site.
Thank you.
>
>> I'm guessing the tk would result in the
>> smallest executable as well, though I could be very wrong.
>
> The last time I compared wx vs tk bundled sizes using py2exe (for a
> fairly simple application), using tk generated far larger .exe files.
>
> When you use Tk, it pulls in a complete TCL implementation as well as
> the Tk libraries (which contain way more library files than wx --
> IIRC, there was a _lot_ of localization stuff in the Tk libraries).
>
> --
> Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! ... he dominates the
> at DECADENT SUBWAY SCENE.
> gmail.com
>
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
