On 2017-08-05, Michael Torrie <torr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well tk is already an optional part of the Python standard library,
> whereas wx is an external package. So for your simple requirements,
> Tk may be the way to go.
I find it much easier to get a simple application written and working
with Tk than with wx. However, once the size/complexity increases
beyond a certain point, I find wx to be less work.
> I'm guessing the tk would result in the
> smallest executable as well, though I could be very wrong.
The last time I compared wx vs tk bundled sizes using py2exe (for a
fairly simple application), using tk generated far larger .exe files.
When you use Tk, it pulls in a complete TCL implementation as well as
the Tk libraries (which contain way more library files than wx --
IIRC, there was a _lot_ of localization stuff in the Tk libraries).
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! ... he dominates the
at DECADENT SUBWAY SCENE.
gmail.com
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
