Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote: > John Machin wrote: > > >>... AND it's about time that list is updated to include False explicitly >> -- save nitpicking arguments about whether False is covered by >>"numeric zero of all types" :-) > > > Done.
Thanks -- those of us who actually read manuals salute you. > >w about >> for c in f.read(): > [snip] > Don't forget > > for line in f: > for c in line: > # do stuff > OK. I'll pay that one. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
