On 05/17/2017 02:31 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote: > Can you give an example of such a method? Often, that signature is used > because there is no pre-conception of what the arguments might be.
I'm not sure if this afflicts the standard library, but in my own code, since Python doesn't support constructors with different signatures, you pretty much have to rely on kwargs with __init__() to handle different permutations of construction arguments. Not that we don't know what the arguments might be, we just don't know which of them we'll have to deal with. Maybe the standard library is better designed than my own code, but I find I have to implement __init__(self, **kwargs) all the time. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
