On 18/05/16 17:21, Ned Batchelder wrote: > Ideally, an empty test wouldn't be a success, but I'm not sure how > the test runner could determine that it was empty. I guess it could > introspect the test function to see if it had any real code in it, > but I don't know of a test runner that does that.
Simple: a function which does not produce at least one "failure" or "pass" does not test anything. No need to introspect the code. Just check if the total score of failures and passes has changed after the function was run. Thomas -- Ce n'est pas parce qu'ils sont nombreux à avoir tort qu'ils ont raison! (Coluche) -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
