DFS wrote: > On 5/7/2016 2:52 PM, Christopher Reimer wrote: >> On 5/7/2016 9:51 AM, DFS wrote: >>> Has anyone ever in history gotten 10/10 from pylint for a non-trivial >>> program? >> >> I routinely get 10/10 for my code. While pylint isn't perfect and >> idiosyncratic at times, it's a useful tool to help break bad programming >> habits. Since I came from a Java background, I had to unlearn everything >> from Java before I could write Pythonic code. It might help to use an >> IDE that offers PEP8-compliant code suggestions (I use PyCharm IDE). >> >>> That's about as good as it's gonna get! >> >> You can do better. > > 10/10 on pylint isn't better.
Not always, but where you and pylint disagree I'm more likely to side with the tool ;) > It's being robotic and conforming to the > opinions of the author of that app. The problem are the tool's limitations, the "being robotic" rather than following someone else's opinions. > In fact, I think: > > import os, sys, time, socket > > is much more readable than, and preferable to, > > import os > import sys > import time > import socket > > but pylint complains about the former. Do you use version control? >> You should strive for 10/10 whenever possible, > > nah > > >> figure out why you fall short and ask for help on the parts that don't >> make sense. > > I actually agree with ~3/4 of the suggestions it makes. My code ran > fine before pylint tore it a new one, and it doesn't appear to run any > better after making various fixes. Do you write unit tests? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
