Unfortunately, it's difficult for the core devs to know every hardware and os combination there is. Maybe you could submit a bug report? On Mar 7, 2016 10:56 AM, "Jon Ribbens" <jon+use...@unequivocal.co.uk> wrote:
> On 2016-03-07, mm0fmf <n...@invalid.com> wrote: > > On 07/03/2016 18:09, Jon Ribbens wrote: > >> It only appears to have downloads for 32-bit, or 64-bit AMD processors, > >> not 64-bit Intel processors. > > > > You didn't read the bit that says > > > > "The binaries for AMD64 will also work on processors that implement the > > Intel 64 architecture. (Also known as the "x64" architecture, and > > formerly known as both "EM64T" and "x86-64".) " > > You are quite correct that I did not read the whole of the > ridiculously-long and badly-organised download page. > > I would strongly suggest that, at the very least, the 'Description' > for the x86-64 files should say "for all 64-bit PCs (except Itanium*)" > with the '*' linking to a footnote that explains how to tell if you > have one of those. > > I must say that Python on Windows was a very poor experience indeed, > "virtualenv" does not work and "venv" refuses to create the 'activate' > shell script so does not work either (and pygame doesn't work, but > that's presumably not Python's fault). > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
