On 29/12/2015 22:57, xeon Mailinglist wrote:
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 7:23:40 PM UTC, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 29/12/2015 17:27, xeon Mailinglist wrote:
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 5:15:24 PM UTC, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 29/12/2015 15:20, xeon Mailinglist wrote:
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 11:16:10 AM UTC, xeon Mailinglist wrote:
1. How do I create a global variable that can be accessed by all classes?

2. I am using `dogpile.cache` to store data in the cache [1], but if I set and 
get the same key from different modules, I don't get the value. Here is an 
example in [2]. The value than I get is `NO_VALUE.NO_VALUE`. Why this happens?

setter is the setter.py
getter is the getter.py
Memoize is the file in [1].


[1] my dogpile class `Memoize.py`

       from dogpile.cache import make_region

       region = make_region().configure('dogpile.cache.memory')

       def save(key, value):
         """
         general purpose method to save data (value) in the cache

         :param key (string) key of the value to be saved in cache
         :param value (any type) the value to be saved
         """
         region.set(key, value)


       def get(key):
         """
         general purpose method to get data from the cache

         :param key (string) key of the data to be fetched
         :return value (any type) data to be returned from the cache
         """
         return region.get(key)


[2] My python example

`setter.py`

       def myset(value):
         Memoize.save("myvalue", value)

`getter.py`

      def myget():
         return Memoize.get("myvalue") <- this value is NO_VALUE. NO_VALUE

My class:

       setter.myset(123)
       getter.myget()

The idea that I get from dogpile, is that in each module (getter.py, or 
setter.py) there is a dictionary where the values are stored in the backend. 
Hence, getter.py has its dictionary and setter.py has its dictionary also. In 
the end, there is not a single dictionary where all the values should be put. 
And I want a single dictionary.


Then put everything in one file.  Three files for the amount of code you
show above is nonsensical.  You might like to read
http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/python-is-not-java.html and in response to
that http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/java-is-not-python-either.html

--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Here is the full class that I use to store the data.

from dogpile.cache import make_region


# my_dictionary = {}
region = make_region().configure('dogpile.cache.memory')
# arguments={"cache_dict":my_dictionary})
class Cache:

      @staticmethod
      def save(key, value):
          """
          general purpose method to save data (value) in the cache

          :param key (string) key of the value to be saved in cache
          :param value (any type) the value to be saved
          """
          region.set(key, value)

      @staticmethod
      def get(key):
          """
          general purpose method to get data from the cache

          :param key (string) key of the data to be fetched
          :return value (any type) data to be returned from the cache
          """
          return region.get(key)


      @staticmethod
      def get_or_create(key):
          """
          General purpose method to get data from the cache. If the value does 
not exist, it creates a list

          :param: key (string) key of the data to be fetched
          :return value (any type) data to be returned from the cache
          """
          return region.get_or_create(key, list)

      @staticmethod
      def set_job_predictions(rank_list):
          Cache.save("job_predictions", rank_list)

      @staticmethod
      def get_job_predictions():
          return Cache.get("job_predictions")


I get the strong impression that you're reinventing wheels and doing it
so badly that they're triangular.  Have you tried pypi
https://pypi.python.org/pypi for proven code that could do the job for you?

--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

@Mark
I don't understand your remark. Pypi is a repository. What this has to do with 
my problem?


It might well have working code that you can just use, instead of a dreadful pile of code that has the appalling smell of Java coming out of every seam.

--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to