On 16.09.2015 19:33, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 01:40 am, Random832 wrote:
"in" suggests a relationship between objects of different types (X and
"something that can contain X") - all the other comparison operators are
meant to work on objects of the same or similar types.
`is` and the equality operators are intended to work on arbitrary objects,
as are their inverses `is not` and inequality.
And with operator overloading, < <= > and => could have any meaning you
like:
graph = a => b => c <= d <= e
Sorry? What are you trying to do here?
Why not make isinstance a comparison operator and have "1 instanceof int
instanceof type"? Having chaining apply to things that are not
semantically comparisons is just baffling.
Somewhat ugly, I grant you, but if baffling?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
