On Wed, Sep 16, 2015, at 09:05, Chris Angelico wrote: > My view is that they should remain in the language, but that > dissimilar comparisons should raise linter warnings. I can't imagine a > sane reason for chaining 'in' and equality like that (since the RHS of > 'in' will be a container, and if you're testing the whole container > for equality, you probably don't care about one member in it), but for > language consistency, it's good to support it. > > Chained comparisons of the same type are a great feature:
Do chained "in" comparisons ever really make sense, even when they're all the same type? I mean, I suppose 1 in (1, 2) in ((1, 2), (3, 4)) is technically true, but how useful is it really? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
