On 12.08.2015 18:11, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Sven R. Kunze <srku...@mail.de> wrote:
Unfortunately, no. :(

It should work out of the box with no "let me replace all my try-except
statements in my 10 million line code base".
(Please don't top-post.)

Is this some guideline? I actually quite dislike pick somebody's mail to pieces. It actually pulls things out of context. But if this is a rule for this, so be it.

Sounds to me like you want some sort of AST transform, possibly in an
import hook. Check out something like MacroPy for an idea of how
powerful this sort of thing can be.

Sounds like I MacroPy would enable me to basically insert a function call before and after each try: block at import time. Is that correct so far? That sounds not so bad at all.


However, if that only works due to importing it is not a solution. I need to make sure I catch all try: blocks, the current stack is in (and is about to step into).

Ah yes, and it should work with Python 3 as well.


Regards,
Sven
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to