On Friday, July 17, 2015 at 12:17:55 AM UTC-7, Antoon Pardon wrote: > On 07/17/2015 01:46 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > > Open for bikeshedding: What should the keyword be? We can't use > > "exec", which would match Unix and shell usage, because it's already > > used in a rather different sense in Python. Current candidates: > > "transfer", "goto", "recurse", and anything else you suggest. > > I propose the combination "return from". I think it is similar enough > with "yield from" to justify this and it also won't need an extra > keyword, so no programs will be broken because they used "transfer", > "goto" or whatever other new keyword as an identifier. > > Should there be someone who is willing to spend time on this, I wish > him all luck and strength he can find. I think it would be best if > it was done by someone who is interrested in using this in his own > programs. Because it is all very fine talking about the pro and > cons here and I certainly would use it, the question is, how wide > spread would the use become and is it worth the time and effort to > introduce it. If future use turns out to be disappointing such a > coder can at least think of it as something that was useful for > himself. > > -- > Antoon.
"return from" or "yield from" looks too much like a COMEFROM instruction/statement. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COMEFROM -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
