On 07/17/2015 01:46 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > Open for bikeshedding: What should the keyword be? We can't use > "exec", which would match Unix and shell usage, because it's already > used in a rather different sense in Python. Current candidates: > "transfer", "goto", "recurse", and anything else you suggest.
I propose the combination "return from". I think it is similar enough with "yield from" to justify this and it also won't need an extra keyword, so no programs will be broken because they used "transfer", "goto" or whatever other new keyword as an identifier. Should there be someone who is willing to spend time on this, I wish him all luck and strength he can find. I think it would be best if it was done by someone who is interrested in using this in his own programs. Because it is all very fine talking about the pro and cons here and I certainly would use it, the question is, how wide spread would the use become and is it worth the time and effort to introduce it. If future use turns out to be disappointing such a coder can at least think of it as something that was useful for himself. -- Antoon. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list