Hallöchen! [EMAIL PROTECTED] (phil hunt) writes:
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:51:13 +0200, Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (phil hunt) writes: >> >>> [...] >>> >>> How about sometihing with the same API as Tkinter (so no need to >>> relearn), but which looks prettier? Would that fix your gripes? >> >> I haven't learned Tkinter. > > [...] > > Not that I'm a particular fan of it, it's just I like > standardisation, because then you get network effects. Me too. Therefore I'd like to see a new toolkit in the standard library to see a new network growing. You mustn't do something like this too often of course but I think in this case it would be the right time. >> So for me, it needn't be like Tkinter. The three most important >> attributes for me are Pythonic, modern (both nice-looking and >> comprehensive), and non-niche. > > What you say Pythonic, what do you mean? And how do you rate > Tkinter, PyGtk, PyQt/PyKDE, wxWindows for "Pythonicness"? I don't like to set arguments to -1 or NULL, but to None. I'd like to have extensive support for keyword arguments. I don't like mucking about with ID values. Partly this is cosmetical but partly it's a rich source of errors. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
