On 7/30/05, Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been having a closer look at wxPython which is not Pythonic at > all and bad documented. Probably I'll use it nevertheless. PyGTK > and PyQt may have their own advantages and disadvantages. > > However, in my opinion we don't need yet another binding so thin > that C or C++ is shining through, but a modern replacement for > Tkinter with its Pythonic way of thinking.
I had the exact same impression when I started working with wxPython: it looked and ran great, but I held my nose when coding in it - it just was too un-Pythonic for my tastes. I then discovered Dabo (http://dabodev.com), which is a full application framework, but whose UI layer is a very Pythonic wrapper around wxPython. I've created several apps now using Dabo, even though I haven't even looked at the data connectivity aspects of it; the UI code works fine without it. The authors have done such a great job I'm surprised that it hasn't been more widely adopted. Its development is very active, and they have great support for their users. # p.d. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
