On 06/05/2015 17:03, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2015 10:40 pm, BartC wrote:
But I had in mind not implementing ++ and --, but detecting them and
issuing a warning,
That's a job for a linter, not the compiler. The compiler should be as
flexible as possible in what it accepts:
a , b=12+3 * 4,"hello" . upper ()
is perfectly legal code. The compiler shouldn't force you to write good
looking code, apart from what is prohibited altogether.
Both + and - are unary prefix operators, so you can apply + and - to any
expression -- even an expression that already has a unary prefix operator:
py> - --- +++ + - - + -- +++ --- 999
-999
Is that ugly, horrible code that nobody in their right mind would use in
production? Absolutely. But the compiler can and should accept it, and
linters (or human reviewers) should warn about it.
Linters were mentioned a day or two back. Take a horse to water...
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
