Hi all, Surely you did not look at the package manager and package assortment of OpenBSD.
It is actually a really good example of how package repository can be both reliable, easy to use and up to date. Also, what sort of quality can be expected from a piece of software, whose author is unable to package it properly (or to design it, so it can be packaged)? On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Michael Torrie <torr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/16/2015 08:40 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > > Thanks again. This is an important and difficult problem, with competing > > forces at play, and I am not at all satisfied with the current state of > > packaging. > > I agree. Though I like the concept of package managers and curated > repos, compared to the dismal world of Windows, I also am not very > satisfied with the current state of things. > > That's why I think the ideas coming out of this Red Hat think tank are > interesting and worth discussion. They put forth a possible solution > that keeps the existing things we love about package managers and our > distros of choice, while addressing these important issues in a > maintainable, flexible, and still secure way. > > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >
-- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
