Michael Torrie <torr...@gmail.com>:
> http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/functional/function
>
> Thus if we were to shoehorn your example into C++, the result would be
> idiomatically very similar to what you have in your Python code.
I can understand why you wouldn't write out my example in C++:
using std::placeholders::_1;
std::function<void(int)> f_add_display2 =
std::bind( &Foo::print_add, foo, _1 );
vs
f_add_display2 = foo.print_add
The cherry on top: "_1"! The C++ compiler figures out template types
heroically but can't wrap its head around the arity of the method.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
