On 01/26/2015 02:22 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Jan 26, 2015 6:42 AM, "Andrew Robinson" <andr...@r3dsolutions.com
<mailto:andr...@r3dsolutions.com>> wrote:
> ...
If you're going to descend into insults and name-calling, then I'm not
going to waste any more of my time on this thread.
I don't believe I've actually, intentionally, insulted you. That's
generally not in my nature, although annoyance sometimes comes out.
If my response to D'Aprano's abrasive remarks upset you -- well, sorry.
It honestly wasn't aimed at you and it wasn't derogatory name calling.
eg: If you mean 'bool', instead of 'Boole' that's just because Python
does it.
The restriction on inheriting from bool isn't likely to change. There
have been several suggestions as to how you can do what you want. I
recommend you pick one and get on with it.
FYI: I already have implemented the code twice, so there's no need to
continue the conversation for my sake.
I got 'on' with it a long time ago; but thanks for the advice for what
it's worth.
I hope you enjoyed seeing a C++ type cast of a non bool type into a bool
that can be used as a bool at leisure, although if you've already stated
your pleasure or displeasure -- it may take me a while to find the email
in the backlog so don't feel pressure to repeat yourself.
--Cheers.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
