On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 11:50:26 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Steven D'Aprano > <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote: >> "oh, pip did the wrong thing again? you can fix that by standing on one >> leg, >> sacrificing a goat to the Great Old Dark Ones, deleting these files, or >> possibly some other ones, and if the phase of the moon is exactly right >> it will behave as you want..." > > Replacing an existing package, without changing the version number, > *is* messy. It's not pip's fault that it's hard. That's like saying > "Oops, I committed this to source control and pushed it out to all > users, but there's a big file in it and I want to delete it so they > don't have to download it". Sure, that's possible, but it's not a normal > action, so you'll have to jump through some hoops to make it all work > properly. > > Or have you been having this whole sacrificing a goat thing with a > normal workflow? > > ChrisA
why not simply cheat & call it V 0.2.3 :-) it is not as if there is any regulation concerning what can & cannot constitute a minor release it is all at your own discretion. -- Stamp out philately. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
