On Thursday, August 21, 2014 10:38:04 AM UTC+5:30, Everything You Need To Know 
wrote:
| On Thursday, 21 August 2014 14:19:27 UTC+9:30, Rustom Mody  wrote:
| 
| | On Thursday, August 21, 2014 10:09:45 AM UTC+5:30, Ben Finney wrote:
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | > Everything You Need To Know writes:
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | > > It is not just one person here! To give my name when we are trying to
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | > > be a small group would not work.
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | > That's not how a community operates. Please post as an individual, with
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | > a person's name, to establish your reputation and continuity.
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | > Others can post as themselves. We don't need organisations posting as if
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | > they were a person with one mind.
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | Let me try to put it another way: We are a community of individuals
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | not of corporations, even 'informal' corporations.
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | Your entry here as an individual is welcome; as a corporation its
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | out of place
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
> |I guess I have to agree and was mistaken, though vitriol I found unnecessary 
> and unproductive! Just thought it was in best interest if we posted as one 
> rather than individuals, if we had each other agreeing with one another it by 
> accident or other, it would add extra sway to an individual point of view as 
> we are sharing it.

Ok here's a suggestion:
Post with your 'collective' login
Sign with your individual 'Real' name.¹

Also note you are not yet following the suggestions:
 https://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython 
TO show you how your post looks  to others here, Ive changed the '>' to '|'
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to