Le mercredi 28 mai 2014 22:24:15 UTC+2, Mark Lawrence a écrit : > On 28/05/2014 20:58, Larry Martell wrote: > > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid > > > <mailto:no.email@nospam.invalid>> wrote: > > > > > > Larry Martell <larry.mart...@gmail.com > > > <mailto:larry.mart...@gmail.com>> writes: > > > > Somthing I came across in my travels through the ether: > > > > [1]https://medium.com/@deliciousrobots/5d2ad703365d/ > > > > > > "Python 3 can revive Python" https://medium.com/p/2a7af4788b10 > > > long HN comment thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7801834 > > > > > > "Python 3 is fine" http://sealedabstract.com/rants/python-3-is-fine/ > > > > > > OT: wow that medium site is obnoxious. > > > > > > > > > No company that I work for is using python 3 - they just have too much > > > of an investment in a python 2 code base to switch. I'm just saying. > > > > > > > So you're happy because you've support until at least 2020, and the > > people using Python 3 are happy, mainly because of the vastly improved > > unicode handling via the FSR and asyncio in 3.4. Presumably the only > > unhappy people are those who keep bleating on about forking Python to > > produce a 2.8, or has work on this already started without my knowledge? > > > > -- > > My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask > > what you can do for our language. > > > > Mark Lawrence > ===========
Unicode: a reason to not use Python. jmf -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
