On 28/05/2014 20:58, Larry Martell wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid
<mailto:no.email@nospam.invalid>> wrote:
Larry Martell <larry.mart...@gmail.com
<mailto:larry.mart...@gmail.com>> writes:
> Somthing I came across in my travels through the ether:
> [1]https://medium.com/@deliciousrobots/5d2ad703365d/
"Python 3 can revive Python" https://medium.com/p/2a7af4788b10
long HN comment thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7801834
"Python 3 is fine" http://sealedabstract.com/rants/python-3-is-fine/
OT: wow that medium site is obnoxious.
No company that I work for is using python 3 - they just have too much
of an investment in a python 2 code base to switch. I'm just saying.
So you're happy because you've support until at least 2020, and the
people using Python 3 are happy, mainly because of the vastly improved
unicode handling via the FSR and asyncio in 3.4. Presumably the only
unhappy people are those who keep bleating on about forking Python to
produce a 2.8, or has work on this already started without my knowledge?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
