-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 19/04/14 05:49, Andrew Berg wrote: > On 2014.04.18 22:28, Anthony Papillion wrote: >> What is the general feel of /this/ community? I'm about to start >> a large scale Python project. Should it be done in 2 or 3? What >> are the benefits, aside from the 'it's the future' argument? > Python 3 is not the future; it is the present. If you're developing > an application, just use Python 3.4 and don't look back unless you > absolutely positively *need* one of the big libraries that doesn't > fully support Python 3 yet. The smaller ones either support it or > have been replaced, and the few remaining (e.g., Twisted, Django) > are getting there.
Django has been there since 1.5. My company has been using python3 in production since 1.6 was released. There have been a few other third party libraries we've wanted to use but can't, but we've been able to work around that. Regards, Ian F -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTUnMOAAoJEODsV4MF7PWzhEsH/infLqjUcGh+vSTaMNEvjuRn /vqaxiok5/9opocoDtBbK707rpJz55V+NP1ajhso0llhLlQ1T7XyAK2QQthfvcTd FIyn7uw7ud5nofivXUkkO3g9FoHRASZnAc9mXZGGV7O1RKjA3YvEccOakJKpq/jC UYzBYLOfkUzLYV9yQPaE5Dxt/rRmO1NLNzdBMXXTBOy4s6hd+B+TSCCgAgGy05ZJ yNePgO98N2wq7W/iG4EAw409rxXYxR0cAHNSID7+m1omSTPls4PV+jyIfmoS+eBl 6nWkqjVw3yw2cF0gBs1k/sjxPZ/aXOjD1FxpIhBOvh+upNieFSP0AT2X5R3NRnw= =wW3W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
