On 4/4/14 7:00 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:

Berp, Brython, CLPython, CPython, CapPython, ChinesePython, Compyler,
Copperhead, Cython, HoPe, HotPy, IronPython, Jython, Kivy, Mypy, Mython,
Nuitka, Numba, Parakeet, Parallel Python, Perthon, Pippy, Psyco, Py4A,
PyMite, PyMT, PyPad, PyPy, PyQNX, PyVM, Pycorn, Pyjamas, Pynie,
Pystachio, Pyston, Python for .NET, Python for OS/2, Python for S60,
Python-iPod, Python2C, Pythonce, Pythonium Core, Pythran, QPython,
RapydScript, Shedskin, Skulpt, Stackless, TinyPy, Typhon, UnPython,
Unladen Swallow, Vyper, WPython

   Thanks for this list.

As I said, some of these may be abandoned, obsolete, experimental, or
even vapourware. Some are probably just ports of CPython to another
platform rather than completely independent implementations.

The only one I've used regularly is QPython (on Android) which is apparently a 2.7.2 port. Its relatively slow but 'useful' because its obviously highly mobile, which gives me the opportunity to code-on-the-go, or try a new idea in those awkward times when only a cell-phone is convenient for the venue.

but I know that Jython and IronPython are
serious contenders (although, I have not, nor probably will, use them).

If you are using a Debian-based system, it is trivial to install them via
apt-get or aptitude:

     sudo aptitude install jython ironpython

Its has always seemed to me that Java or C++ would be better suited to creating python. I wonder will C always be the standard canonical PSF python interpreter base language? Has the C python community considered making the standard base language Java or C++ ?


marcus

--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to