The link isn't to prove my ideology of what happens, it to show what you might be thinking about, instead of how I feel about it...nth dimensional dynamics/hyperspace taken out. Been out of this for a while due to medical reasons, but try to keep up on the latest measurements/accumulated data with today's(what has been publicly released) manufacturing levels.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:34 AM, David Hutto <dwightdhu...@gmail.com> wrote: > You would be assuming a quantum leap type theory, that the object has no > Vo->V1, it just adjusts to the constant immediately, instead of what I > would call the quantum leap,without other 'theories' involved, that it has > a classical physics type movement in which it can accelerate from a resting > position, to a velocity, and then regain orbit: > > http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_a_quantum_leap > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:21 AM, David Hutto <dwightdhu...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> u is the initial velocity from a starting/resting point, not a static >> speed at that point, and begins to accelerate, >> over a particular timeframe, in which it's momentum is not stopped by >> friction on which the rails/environment it travels upon has, or the similar >> properties the object might have during acceleration in relation to the >> environment it travels within. >> >> So the object has a starting point at which there is no equal, or >> opposing force, as it begins to accelerate from a resting position(Newton: >> an object will remain in motion, until acted upon by an equal or opposite >> force, and in this case the motion is propulsion of the object, or the >> newtons of propulsion, until it is moving at the exact speed of the >> propulsion applied to the object->Vo-V1, with 0 friction/viscosity during >> this timeframe). >> >> The difference in our opinions, seems to be that there is an initial >> resting state, and not at an already accelerated motion that has reached >> it's maximum capacity. >> >> >> So there is a dynamic in my mind's eye, where the object is at a >> "resting" point initially, and either the environment, or the object can >> maneuver their own viscosity in relation to the other. >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:24 AM, David Hutto <dwightdhu...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >> (1) v = u + at >>> >> >> (2) s = 1/2(u + v)t >>> >> >> (3) s = ut + 1/2(at^2) >>> >> >> (4) v^2 = u^2 + 2as >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Only (1) and (3) are needed. >>> >> > >>> >> > Okay, what's u here? Heh. >>> >> >>> >> u is the initial velocity; v is the velocity after accelerating at a >>> for >>> >> time t. >>> > >>> > >>> > This assumes that the viscosity is in a state of superfluidity, and in >>> a >>> > perfect state between itself, and it's traveling environment. >>> >>> I fail to see how this is relevant. I would assume that the amount of >>> friction is already modeled in the acceleration constants; if it were >>> zero then the brakes would be nonfunctional and the train would not be >>> able to accelerate or decelerate at all. In any case, a change in >>> friction simply works out to a change in acceleration. The equations >>> above still hold true. >>> -- >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> David Hutto >> *CEO:* *http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com >> <http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com>* >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, > David Hutto > *CEO:* *http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com > <http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com>* > -- Best Regards, David Hutto *CEO:* *http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com <http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com>*
-- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
