On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Wolfgang Keller <felip...@gmx.net> wrote:
> And besides, again, a commercially licensed PyQt itself isn't *that*
> expensive.
> The cost of a commercial PyQt license for a single developer is £350
> (GBP). You may pay in either US Dollars, Euros or GBP.
(£420 incl. VAT for UK and select EU entities)
> one [license] per developer
For some people, it might be a lot. Why waste money on something,
that has an almost-identical free-for-everyone version? (which also is
easier to install, BTW)
> PyQt does not include Qt itself. You must also obtain an
> appropriately licensed copy (either the commercial version from
> Digia or the LGPL version from the Qt Project).
So, you have four options:
a) use PySide and Qt@Project, pay $0 and be sane (albeit saner than
person B);
b) use PyQt4 and Qt@Digia, pay £350/£420 + £??? and be sane;
c) use PySide and Qt@Digia, pay £??? and look like a hypocrite (albeit
less than person D);
d) use PyQt4 and Qt@Project, pay £350/£420 and look like a hypocrite.
DISCLAIMER: Some things are based on assumptions, many of which may be
incorrect.
PS. For those living in the past without proper Unicode support: £ = GBP.
--
Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick <http://kwpolska.tk>
PGP: 5EAAEA16
stop html mail | always bottom-post | only UTF-8 makes sense
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
