On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:36:51 +0000, MRAB wrote: > On 12/12/2013 11:44, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 23:25:53 -0800, Robert Voigtländer wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have a list like this: >>> >>> a = [(52, 193), (52, 193), (52, 192), ... >>> >>> >>> I need to find a -performant- way to transform this into a list with >>> tuples (a[0],[a[0][1]min],[a[0][1]max]). >> >> I'm afraid I don't know what you mean by "performant". It doesn't >> appear to be an English word, so far as I can tell. Do you mean >> efficient? >> > [snip] > > There's some debate over whether it's English or not: > > http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/38945/what-is-wrong-with-the- word-performant
Ah! I've never come across it before, and it wasn't in any of the electronic dictionaries I tried, nor the dead-tree Shorter Oxford. I think I don't dislike it. -- Steven -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
