On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:22:27 -0800, rusi wrote: > On Thursday, November 28, 2013 9:20:39 PM UTC+5:30, Alister wrote: >> On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 02:08:17 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote: > >> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:04 AM, rusi wrote: >> >> Its really quite unclear to me why GG is a problem if all the >> >> problems of GG are obviated. >> > Which is easier, fiddling around with your setup so you can post >> > reasonably on Google Groups, or just getting a better client? With >> > your setup, you have to drop out to another editor and press F9 for >> > it to work. With pretty much any other newsreader on the planet, this >> > works straight off, no setup necessary. >> > I'm still going to advise people to stop using buggy rubbish. >> > ChrisA > >> Whilst I agree with Chris A's main points I would at least say thankyou >> for :- > > Well thanks for the thanks :-) > > >> A) finding a solution that works for you. >> B) Posting it so that others can try it to see if it works for them. > >> Perhaps the best option is for everybody to bombard Google with bug >> reports (preferably typed with extra long lines & double spaced as that >> is clearly what they are used to & we would not want to upset them >> would we? ) > > If that has even a small likelihood of succeeding I heartily support it. > My impression is its been done with no result -- Usenet is too fringe > and obsolete a technology for Google to bother. > > On a different note your message has arrived 4 times. > What client did you use?
I thought I had resolved that last week (using Pan under linux) -- A bureaucrat's idea of cleaning up his files is to make a copy of everything before he destroys it. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
