On 12 September 2013 16:47, Paul Rudin <paul.nos...@rudin.co.uk> wrote: > Joshua Landau <jos...@landau.ws> writes: > >> If the time learning a set of tools is enough to make the choice >> between tools, I suggest avoiding, say, Vim. > > That's a big if. > > If you expect to spend a lot of time editing text, code, etc. over the > next few years then it's definitely learning at least one of vim or > emacs to a reasonable degree of competency.
You misunderstood my argument. I was trying to say that because people are willing to put the time in to learn Vim and Emacs, there's already a precedent that the time spent *isn't* enough to make the choice between tools, and thus the argument I was responding to was wrong. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
