Rocco Moretti wrote: > It's been quite some time since I've looked at Forth, and the reference > material that I used then was probably outdated anyway.
Sorry, thought of one more thing Python has going for it vs. Forth - reference material. Check the catalog of your local library. I'd guess that there is more choice for Python programming books vs. Forth programming books. If your local library does have a Forth book, it's likely that it'll be discussing some 1970's interpreter that ran on a now-defunct timesharing system, if mine is any indication. If you can afford to buy books, the selection at a new or used bookseller is going to be *much* better with Python than with Forth. My local new bookseller has at least a shelf of Python books. I don't think I saw any Forth ones last time I was there - they might have had a single title that I missed. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
