On 24/10/2012 10:32, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Le mardi 23 octobre 2012 18:41:45 UTC+2, Ian a écrit :
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:47 AM, <wxjmfa...@gmail.com> wrote:
In any case, have you been following the progress of issue 16061?
There is a patch for the str.replace regression that you identified,
which results in better performance across the board than 3.2. So
although 3.3 is slower than 3.2 on this one microbenchmark, 3.4 will
not be.
Yes.
A workaround to solve one of the corner cases of something
which is wrong by design.
jmf
Do you get paid money for acting as a complete moron or do you do it for
free?
--
Cheers.
Mark Lawrence.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
