In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
.
.
>> You wouldn't have to distribute the (rather expensive) Access application
>> since this is little more than a front for the underlying DAO/ADO database
>> libraries that are built into the warp and woof of MS Windows. Your Python
>> application can address the DAO or ADO directly as these will libraries will
>> be pre-installed and/or freely available for MS Windows. Fast, freely
>> available, no license restrictions, and no need for extra downloads for a
>> reasonably recent (Win2000, XP) operating system.
>>
>
>And then XP Autoupdate executes, some of those Access/MSDE libraries are
>updated, and you app is broken.
Are you saying that Python-based applications are particularly
vulnerable in this all-too-common scenario? If so, I'm not
getting it; why is the architecture described more fragile than
more traditional Windows-oriented development patterns? If not,
then, ... well then I truly don't get your point.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
