On 6/22/2005 3:08 PM, Cameron Laird wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>On 6/22/2005 1:14 PM, Dave Cook wrote: >> >>>On 2005-06-22, Cameron Laird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Are you saying that Python-based applications are particularly >>>>vulnerable in this all-too-common scenario? If so, I'm not >>>>getting it; why is the architecture described more fragile than >>>>more traditional Windows-oriented development patterns? If not, >>>>then, ... well then I truly don't get your point. >>> >>> >>>Maybe the point is the downside of depending on installed DLLs rather than >>>shipping your own. >>> >>>Dave Cook >> >>Yes, DLL hell. > > > ? > > OK, I'm with you part of the way. Typical "Access" developers > are *always* involved with DLL hell, right? You're surely not > saying that Python worsens that frustration, are you?
No. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
