On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:37:35 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote: >> Assuming it manages to catch up with Py3, which a decade makes entirely >> possible, this I can well believe. And while we're sounding all hopeful, >> maybe Python will be on popularity par with every other P in the classic >> LAMP stack. *That* would be a Good Thing. > > Given how Perl has slipped in the last decade or so, that would be a step > backwards for Python :-P
LAMP usually means PHP these days. There's a lot of that around. ChrisA -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
