On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:37:35 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Steven D'Aprano > <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
>> While PyPy is still a work in progress, and is not anywhere near as >> mature as (say) gcc or clang, it should be considered production-ready. > > That's all very well, but unless I have my facts badly wrong, PyPy is > only compatible with Python 2 - right? At the moment, yes. Support for Python 3 is in active development. http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2012/09/py3k-status-update-6.html [...] > Assuming it manages to catch up with Py3, which a decade makes entirely > possible, this I can well believe. And while we're sounding all hopeful, > maybe Python will be on popularity par with every other P in the classic > LAMP stack. *That* would be a Good Thing. Given how Perl has slipped in the last decade or so, that would be a step backwards for Python :-P -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
