On 26/09/2012 15:50, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
I should add that I have not the knowledge to dive in the Python code. But I "see" what has been done.
How?
As I have a very good understanding of all this coding of characters stuff, I can just pick up - in fact select characters or combination of characters - which I supspect to be problematic and I see the results.
Have you run the Python benchmarks yet, as people have more trust in something tangible than a claim that "I see the results"? You were asked to do this one month ago. If yes please publish your results. If no why not, if your claims were correct running the benchmarks would obviously support you?
Not only this, I can select characters, I know a user is supposed to use or will use eg. a specific scrit/language, a typographical work, ... (Do not ask how and why, I know this).
Please state how and why.
I'm not interesting in the other languages or in unicode therory (also I not bad on this level).
Please prove your statement in brackets, nothing less is acceptable if you're making claims, you need to substantiate them.
I just see the results and the facts. For an end user, this is the only thing that counts.
The modern day Pinball Wizard? Or a physic? Or what?
jmf
#pseudo code for _ in range(-inf, +inf, 1): print(FUD) -- Cheers. Mark Lawrence. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
