On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:31 PM, <wxjmfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > you are correct. But the price you pay for this is extremely > high. Now, practically all characters are affected, espacially > those *in* the Basic *** Multilingual*** Plane, these characters > used by non "American" user (No offense here, I just use this > word for ascii/latin-1). > > I'm ready to be considered as an idiot, but I'm not blind. > As soon as I tested these characters, Py3.3 performs really > badly. It seems to me it is legitimate to consider, there > is a serious problem here.
We've been over this thread. The only reason you're counting 3.3 as worse is because you're comparing against a narrow build of Python 3.2. Narrow builds are **BUGGY** and this needed to be resolved. When you compare against a wide build, semantics of 3.2 and 3.3 are identical, and then - and ONLY then - can you sanely compare performance. And 3.3 stacks up much better. ChrisA -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
