Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: > A good tool would reduce the effort and guide users, like e.g. giving > them a hint if they leave the whole mail they're replying to as copy. > Several corporate email solutions (like MS Outlook/Exchange) put very > little emphasis on communication efficiency but only on eye-candy > features. Their popularity and the resulting influence on people has > caused decay in average communication culture, and that is what I blame > them for.
True, but it is by no means impossible or very difficult. It just requires some effort. I blame the user more and the software less because of quotes like below. [ Not Ulrich ] > GMail uses top-posting by default. [ Back to Ulrich ] > BTW: You omitted the attribution line for the text you quoted, whom do > you blame for that? That said, "Nonsense" is a strong enough word to > start a flamewar... not nice. Fair enough. I typically leave off attribution because I would rather to discuss things with quotes instead of he-said and she-said. The focus should be on the idea/conversation and less about attributing "blame" to someone (and it is invariably more often negative attribution than positive). If attribution is preferred, I suppose I could always add it back in. Ironically, this is one of the things I wish Outlook was better about. Ramit This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses, confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers, available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
