On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> Yes. But having to manage it *by hand* is still unclean:
Well, my point was that Python's current behaviour _is_ that.
> * you still have to assign the default value to the function assignment
> outside the function, which is inelegant;
C's static variables are initialized inside the function. But since
Python doesn't have that, it doesn't really work that way. (You might
be able to use a decorator to do some cool tricks though.)
> * if you rename the function, the internal lookup func.default_value will
> fail.
Python would benefit some from a "current-function" reference, if
tricks like this were to be encouraged. It'd help with recursion too.
hmmmm...
>>> def Y(func):
return lambda *args,**kwargs: func(func,*args,**kwargs)
>>> @Y
def foo(me,x):
if x>5: return x
return me(me,x+1),7,x
>>> foo(3)
(((6, 7, 5), 7, 4), 7, 3)
Useful? Not very. Maybe as a language feature, but not as a parameter.
But of curiosity value.
ChrisA
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
