On Oct 31, 8:01 am, dhyams <dhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for all of the responses; everyone was exactly correct, and > obeying the binding rules for special methods did work in the example > above. Unfortunately, I only have read-only access to the class > itself (it was a VTK class wrapped with SWIG), so I had to find > another way to accomplish what I was after. > Please share what you found as the other way. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- How to mix-in __getattr__ after the fact? dhyams
- Re: How to mix-in __getattr__ after the fact? Jerry Hill
- Re: How to mix-in __getattr__ after the fact? Ethan Furman
- Re: How to mix-in __getattr__ after the fact? Lie Ryan
- Re: How to mix-in __getattr__ after the fact? dhyams
- Re: How to mix-in __getattr__ after the fact? DevPlayer
- Re: How to mix-in __getattr__ after the fact? Lie Ryan
- Re: How to mix-in __getattr__ after the fact? Steven D'Aprano