-----Original Message----- From: python-list-bounces+ramit.prasad=jpmchase....@python.org [mailto:python-list-bounces+ramit.prasad=jpmchase....@python.org] On Behalf Of Frank Millman Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 12:51 AM To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Convert '165.0' to int
On Jul 25, 2:04 am, Gregory Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > Frank Millman wrote: > > I know I am flogging a dead horse here, but IMHO, '165', '165.', > > '165.0', and '165.00' are all valid string representations of the > > integer 165.[1] > > > Therefore, for practical purposes, it would not be wrong for python's > > 'int' function to accept these without complaining. > > How far would you go with that? Would you also accept > '1.65e2' as a valid representation of the integer 165? > To be honest, I don't even know what that means! I could read up on it, but I think this has gone far enough. Having flogged this horse to death, I will now let it rest in peace :-) Frank -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list ======================== '1.65e2' is a fairly standard representation of scientific notation. It basically translates to: 1.65 x 10^2 For more details, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_notation Ramit Ramit Prasad | JPMorgan Chase Investment Bank | Currencies Technology 712 Main Street | Houston, TX 77002 work phone: 713 - 216 - 5423 This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses, confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers, available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list