Frank Millman wrote:

I know I am flogging a dead horse here, but IMHO, '165', '165.',
'165.0', and '165.00' are all valid string representations of the
integer 165.[1]

Therefore, for practical purposes, it would not be wrong for python's
'int' function to accept these without complaining.

How far would you go with that? Would you also accept
'1.65e2' as a valid representation of the integer 165?

--
Greg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to