On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:43 PM, harrismh777 <harrismh...@charter.net> wrote: >> I realize you are now asserting that compatibility is a boolean >> condition, and that "totally incompatible" is a redundant phrase that >> you tossed out as a joke. I don't know whether you're sincere or >> backpedaling, but in any case this assertion is flatly ludicrous. >> Following your definition,*nothing* is compatible with anything else. >> If you disagree, then I invite you to list one example of two >> different things that are compatible. > > one man, and one woman....
Now you're equivocating. The discussion has been about whether Python 2 and Python 3 are compatible in the "interchangeable" sense, not in the "capable of functioning together" sense. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
