On Sat, 2011-04-16, Chris Angelico wrote: > Based on the comments here, it seems that emacs would have to be the > editor-in-chief for programmers. I currently use SciTE at work; is it > reasonable to, effectively, bill my employer for the time it'll take > me to learn emacs? I'm using a lot of the same features that the OP > was requesting (multiple files open at once, etc), plus I like syntax > highlighting (multiple languages necessary - I'm often developing > simultaneously in C++, Pike, PHP, and gnu make, as well as Python).
Your editor seems popular, free, cross-platform and capable ... if you already know it well, I can't see why you should switch. Unless you're truly not productive in SciTE, but I'd have to watch you use it for hours to tell. (That should really be a new job title. Just as there are aerobics instructors or whatever at the gyms to help you use the equipment there safely and efficiently, there should be text editor instructors!) /Jorgen -- // Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . . \X/ snipabacken.se> O o . -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
