On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:11:37 +0000, Grant Edwards wrote: > The point I was trying to make was that the 240 was a > superset of the 220, and could be used identically as the 220 was used. > Fair enough: I bow to hands-on experience.
My source - http://vt100.net/vt_history - Says "There is no VT200 as such; the VT220 is a text terminal, while the VT240 and VT241 are graphics terminals, supporting Digital’s ReGIS graphics and Tektronix vector graphics." which I read to mean that a 240/241 wouldn't accept the same command set as the 220. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
