Okay, thats what I was looking for, thanks. In my case, I'll just implement the (needed) reflected operators in my class.
Chris On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Daniel Urban <urban.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 01:51, Chris Kaynor <ckay...@zindagigames.com> > wrote: > > I am implemented a custom set-like type which interacts with some > > third-party software when retrieving and mutating the set, and have > derived > > my custom type off of collections.MutableSet, however I have noticed that > > some of the magic methods supported by the built-in set do not fully > > function with my custom type. From this, I looked over the > > MutableSet definition in and it seems to be missing all of the reflected > > operators (__rsub__, __rand__, __ror__, __rxor__, and friends) for the > > operators it has defined. I can post a simple example case if desired. > > I am using Python 2.6.4 (with some in-house customizations), however a > quick > > look over the svn repository shown on python.org makes it appear that > these > > are also not implemented in Python 3. I was wondering if there is some > > reason for this, or if it was merely an oversight. > > Chris > > See http://bugs.python.org/issue8743 and also > http://bugs.python.org/issue2226 > > > Daniel >
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
